Papers with multiple-choice questions
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Specialized benchmarks can be leveraged to create quizzes that can effectively train engineering and marketing personnel on novel product offerings in a continually growing Cisco product space. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate multiple-choice questions using domain-specific prompts using a set of professional certification textbooks and a range of latest open-source and proprietary LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed quiz engine generates multiple-choice questions using domain-specific prompts and a range of latest open-source, and proprietary LLMs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Domain-adaptive pre-training (DAPT) is one approach for enabling LLMs to handle unseen knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose to disentangle the answering process into three subtasks and evaluate the performance of each subtask. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model resolves the elicitation task that the base model struggled with but does not resolve other subtasks. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing educational tools for medical residents are time-consuming and inconsistent. |
| Approach: | They propose a system that generates educational content and multiple-choice questions from clinical case reports and a pipeline that takes clinical case report input and produces targeted educational materials. |
| Outcome: | The system generates educational content and multiple-choice questions from clinical case reports and synergizes with local knowledge base to ensure it is foundationally sound and current. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been exhibiting outstanding abilities to reason around cognitive states, intentions, and reactions of all people involved, letting humans guide and comprehend day-to-day social interactions effectively. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple-choice questions (MCQ) benchmarks to assess LLMs' ability to reason around cognitive states, intentions, and reactions of all people involved to investigate their resilience abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models exhibit exceptional abilities to reason around cognitive states, intentions, and reactions of all people involved, letting humans guide and comprehend day-to-day social interactions effectively. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing commonsense evaluations are often posed as multiple-choice questions, allowing models to exploit systematic biases. |
| Approach: | They propose a generative task that evaluates common sense via multiple open-ended generations and a method that strongly correlates with human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms strong language model baselines on a dataset of human and machine common sense. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural language processing (NLP) tasks take either a single or multiple text elements to predict an output variable. |
| Approach: | They propose an information-theoretic framework to analyse the influence of inputs on the output of text classification tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is available at: https://github.com/WangLuran/nlp-element-influence. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Long-Context Language Models (LCLMs) can encode entire document collections, offering a strong alternative to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). |
| Approach: | They propose to use LCLMs to encode documents with context windows of millions of tokens to improve their performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training strategies improve long-context performance and their robustness under compression techniques. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Machine reading comprehension (MRC) systems focus on selecting the correct answer to a question given a context paragraph. |
| Approach: | They propose to use machine reading comprehension (MRC) to assess the ability of systems to understand natural language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms a system built with an NOA option . the results show that the system is not confident about the NOA choice . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Scenario-based question answering (SQA) requires retrieving and reading paragraphs from a large corpus to answer a question contextualized by a long scenario description. |
| Approach: | They propose a model where the retriever is implicitly supervised only using QA labels via a novel word weighting mechanism. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms strong baselines on multiple-choice questions in three datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a positional bias, particularly an even worse “anchored bias” in the GPT-2 family, where they consistently favour the first choice ‘A’ in MCQs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the “logit lens” method to trace and modify the internal modules within GPT-2 models responsible for this bias. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach mitigates the positional bias and improves the accuracy of the GPT-2 model across multiple datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various NLP tasks, but previous studies have shown they are sensitive to prompt wording and few-shot demonstrations and their order. |
| Approach: | They focus on LLMs robustness on multiple-choice questions . they find a performance gap of 13% to 85% when options are reordered . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms supervised models on multiple choice questions even outperforming humans. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks on longcontext large language models fail to reflect their deep understanding capabilities across diverse tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the ability of long-context large language models to handle long-text problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 50.1% accuracy when directly answering the questions . human experts achieve only 53.7% accuracy under a 15-minute time constraint . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Social intelligence is essential for understanding and reasoning about human expressions, intents and interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a methodology to study the soundness of Social-IQ by applying simple perturbations to a dataset of multiple choice questions on videos of complex social interactions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces biases in the original dataset and improves performance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing scientific fact-checking datasets are limited due to expertise bottleneck . multi2Claim pipeline is a tool to convert multiple-choice questions into fact- checking data . |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline for automatically converting multiple-choice questions into fact-checking data . they generate two large-scale datasets for scientific-fact-checker tasks . success at this task can help the reader understand scientific topics and promote science . |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline improves performance on two large-scale scientific fact-checking datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research has explored mental health condition classifications, empathetic conversations, and chatbots designed for simple discourse structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for systematic evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy assistance using Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark includes three levels of tasks covering key aspects of cognitive behavioral therapy that could be enhanced through AI assistance. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing video understanding evaluation frameworks that use fill-in-the-blanks do not reflect real-world tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use fill-in-the-blanks as a video understanding evaluation framework and introduce a novel dataset that collects multiple perspectives on the same video. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework does not share the weaknesses of the current state-of-the-art language-informed video understanding tasks, namely: (1) video question answering using multiple-choice questions, where models perform relatively well because they exploit linguistic biases in the task formulation; (2) video captioning, which relies on an open-ended evaluation framework that is often inaccurate because system answers may be perceived as incorrect if they differ in form from the ground truth. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained large language models may answer differently in different languages . this contrasts with a multilingual human, who would likely answer consistently . |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of territorial disputes which includes multiple-choice questions in 49 languages . they propose metrics to quantify bias and consistency in responses across different languages based on their data . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model recalls certain knowledge inconsistently when asked in different languages. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reading comprehension datasets focus on factual and literal understanding of context paragraphs, but our dataset focuses on reading between the lines over a diverse collection of everyday narratives. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale dataset that requires commonsense-based reading comprehension, formulated as multiple-choice questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture improves over the baselines of existing reading comprehension datasets and shows a significant gap between machine (68.4%) and human performance (94%). |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit systematic preferences for answer choices when answering multiple-choice questions. |
| Approach: | They propose two methods to identify and remove internal sources of selection bias . they propose Choice Kullback-Leibler Divergence (CKLD) to capture distributional imbalances in model predictions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve answer accuracy while reducing selection bias. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on large language models have shown that they are poorly aligned in practice. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate safety in large language models . they propose two new metrics to quantify fake alignment and obtain corrected performance estimation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework and two metrics show that some models with purported safety are poorly aligned in practice. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are often evaluated using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) modeled on exams like the USMLE. |
| Approach: | They created a fictional medical benchmark centered on an imaginary organ, the Glianorex, to separate memorized knowledge from reasoning ability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms base models in English but not in French. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for processing large textual content face insufficient adaptation to task-specific needs and missing multi-segmentation relationships. |
| Approach: | They propose a question then reflection memory mechanism which integrates a dual-structured memory pool and a structured graph guidance to facilitate a reflective trial-and-error approach for navigating and identifying relevant segments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves superior performance on multiple-choice questions and multi-doc QA. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models claim to perform better on tasks measuring model capabilities, but there is no standard setup for reproducible evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a document that is documented and practical for reproducible LLM evaluations and includes recommendations from existing literature and new experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed standard identifies and reviews the varying factors in evaluation practices adopted by the community, such as prompt formatting, choice of in-context examples, probability normalizations, and task formulation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing commonsense reasoning models work by scoring a question-candidate pair, but new approaches are needed to answer multiple-choice questions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a corpus of commonsense facts to answer a commonsensical question without any pre-defined choices as a resource. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline methods by a large margin in the open-ended commonsense reasoning task. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a novel application of large language models (LLMs) to legal education helps non-experts learn complex legal concepts . authors find storytelling helps nonexperts understand complex legal terms and concepts compared to definitions . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel application of large language models to legal education . they use LLMs to generate legal stories explaining complex legal concepts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves comprehension and interest among non-native speakers compared to definitions . the novel method also shows that non-experts retain more stories . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on question answering relies on factoid questions with little general knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to capture commonsense question answering with prior knowledge . they extract multiple-choice questions that discriminate between the source and target concepts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset captures commonsense reasoning beyond associations . it obtains 56% accuracy, well below human performance, which is 89% . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks for large language models are limited for Greek . Existing datasets are often machine-translated from English, failing to capture Greek linguistic and cultural characteristics. |
| Approach: | They propose a native-sourced benchmark for massive multitask language understanding in Greek . they publicize 16,857 samples and reserve 4,948 samples for a private leaderboard . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 21,805 multiple-choice questions across 45 subject areas . the model is publicly released and reserved for a private leaderboard . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | B-REASO is the first inclusive assessment suite for advanced foundation model knowledge and reasoning skills in a Bengali language setup. |
| Approach: | We provide a Bengali assessment suite to assess advanced foundation model knowledge and reasoning skills in a language setup. |
| Outcome: | The B-REASO includes multiple-choice questions with four different degrees of difficulty . the questions cover 50 different fields, from science and engineering to the humanities . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new variational approach to distractors in multiple-choice questions is needed . high-quality distractors are crucial to the assessment and pedagogical value of MCQs . a variational method that learns the error behind distractors is more effective . |
| Approach: | They propose a variational approach that learns an interpretable representation of errors behind distractors in math MCQs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on distractors in math MCQs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained language models (LMs) are used to discriminate on multiple-choice tasks that place probability mass on vocabulary tokens that aren’t among the given answer choices. |
| Approach: | They propose a mathematical formalism for SFC which allows us to quantify and bound its impact for the first time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method eliminates the impact of SFC in the majority of instances. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has highlighted the culturally-contingent nature of commonsense knowledge . a multi-stage process is used to evaluate the commonsence of English LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a test set of 525 multiple-choice questions to evaluate commonsense knowledge of English LLMs in Ghana and the u.s. They use existing commonsensible datasets to rewrite them in a multi-stage process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the culturally-contingent commonsense knowledge of English LLMs in Ghana and the United States. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generating multiple-choice questions (MCQG) for professional exams is challenging due to outdated knowledge, hallucination issues, and prompt sensitivity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for converting medical cases into high-quality USMLE-style questions using a self-refine-based framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves human expert satisfaction regarding quality and difficulty of medical questions. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice cloze tests are a prevalent form of assessment that evaluates students' comprehension and inference abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for distractor generation using readily available pre-trained language models . human evaluations confirm that their approach produces more effective distractors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods without training or fine-tuning human evaluations confirm it. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research aims to unlock the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) chain-of-thought (COT) prompting can help LLMs reason toward correct answers, but its efficacy in reasoning toward incorrect answers is unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a task where large language models reason toward incorrect answers using chain-of-thought prompting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task underperforms the strategy of choosing the correct answer on commonsense and scientific reasoning datasets. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models predominantly reflect Western cultures due to the dominance of English-centric training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to assess the sensitivity of LLMs to Persian culture. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows a 11.3% gap between best closed-source model and layperson baseline while the gap increases to 21.3% by using the best open-weight model. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LMs undergo task-agnostic pertaining, but task-specific pretraining has gained prominence. |
| Approach: | They propose retrieval augmented pretraining and task-specific pretraining for DG . they propose to refine language model pretraining to align it more closely with downstream task . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance of multiple-choice questions by integrating knowledge graphs and language models. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Misleading visualizations can distort perception and lead to incorrect conclusions. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale multimodal dataset to evaluate MLLMs on misleading chart reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates MLLMs on misleading chart reasoning on a large-scale multimodal dataset spanning 21 misleader types and 10 chart types . it contains 3,026 curated examples spanning standard chart code, CSV data, multiple-choice questions, and labeled explanations, validated through iterative MLML checks and exhausted expert human review. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Analogy-making between narratives is crucial for human reasoning . despite its importance, there has been limited research on story analogies . |
| Approach: | They construct a large-scale story-level analogy corpus with 24K story pairs . they find that the tasks are incredibly difficult for large language models such as ChatGPT . |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus contains 24K story pairs from diverse domains with human annotations on two similarities from the extended Structure-Mapping Theory. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Supervised approaches to difficulty estimation have yielded mixed results . generative large models are seen as a weakness when answering questions . |
| Approach: | They exploit generative large models to explore correlations between two different metrics of uncertainty, and the actual student response distribution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model uncertainty is different in the case of correct vs wrong answers and the student response distribution is different. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Open benchmarks are essential for evaluating large language models, but their accessibility makes them likely targets of test set contamination. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages backdoor attacks to flag models that used benchmark test sets during training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework detects models that trained on benchmark test sets without loss of logits or internal details . it can prevent false accusations while providing strong evidence for every detected case of contamination. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of text from the Internet, but do they understand the viral content that rapidly spreads online? |
| Approach: | They introduce a dataset for CHinese Internet Meme Explanation that includes popular phrase-based memes from the Chinese Internet. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes popular phrase-based memes from the Chinese Internet, annotated with detailed information on their meaning, origin, example sentences, types, etc. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for comprehensively evaluating Chinese Large Language Models are insufficient. |
| Approach: | They propose a Large-scale, Holistic, and Multi-subject Knowledge Evaluation benchmark to evaluate Chinese Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark measures the knowledge acquisition capabilities of Chinese Large Language Models across 75 subjects from primary school to professional certification exams. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for legal general intelligence (GI) are result-oriented and do not evaluate the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese legal benchmark for evaluating legal GI in large language models . they use recent legal cases and exam questions to create multiple-choice questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks lack a systematic evaluation of the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs) the results show that even the best LLMs lagging behind human legal professionals. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current distractor generation methods produce shared distractors for all students, ignoring individual variations in reasoning, which limits their diagnostic effectiveness. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which tailors distractors to each student’s specific cognitive flaws, inferred from their past question-answering (QA) history. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in generating plausible distractors and adapts to group-level settings. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated sophisticated capabilities, including the ability to process and comprehend extended contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual, multi-task evaluation benchmark designed to evaluate long-context understanding in English and Arabic. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark targets context lengths ranging from 4k to over 128k tokens. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are critical for identifying misconceptions and gaps in knowledge and accurately assessing students' understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose to train a model to generate distractors that are more likely to be selected by students by a pairwise ranker and a distractor generator via Direct Preference Optimization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and performs comparable to humans in various metrics including pairwise rank accuracy and distractor plausibility. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks and MLLMs focus on single-image input scenarios, leaving performance of ML models when handling multiple images underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate fine-grained abilities of multimodal large language models in multi-image scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: MII, MKS and MIC. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing fairness benchmarks for large language models focus on simple tasks . a new framework evaluates biases in LLMs through essay-style prompts . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that evaluates biases in large language models through essay-style prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework uncovers subtle biases difficult to detect in simple responses. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing solutions to supervise the reasoning process are prohibitively expensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a cost-effective reinforcement learning framework that enhances reasoning quality using a small, general-purpose LLM only. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that CLARity improves reasoning quality by 16.5% over standard outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) human evaluations confirm substantial gains in factual correctness and reasoning coherence, leading to more trustworthy model outputs. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large multimodal models exhibit remarkable intelligence, yet their embodied cognitive abilities during motion in open-ended urban aerial spaces remain to be explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate whether large multimodal models can process continuous first-person visual observations like humans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can process first-person visual observations like humans, enabling recall, perception, reasoning, and navigation. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in global healthcare . yet their outputs reflect Western-centric training data and omit indigenous medical systems . |
| Approach: | They evaluate cultural bias in instruction-tuned medical LLMs using a curated dataset of African traditional herbal medicine. |
| Outcome: | The findings show that cultural biases remain embedded in model training . the findings highlight the need for culturally informed evaluation strategies . |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing solutions to automate KC generation and tagging for open-ended programming problems are highly labor-intensive and prone to bias and errors. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated pipeline for KC generation and tagging for open-ended programming problems using large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing ones and outperfies human-written KCs on future student response prediction. |
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks measure ToM capability improvement through story-reading, multiple-choice questions from a third-person perspective, while ignoring the first-person, dynamic nature of human-AI interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a new paradigm of interactive ToM evaluation with both perspective and metric shifts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the performance of four representative LLM enhancement techniques using real-world datasets and a user study. |